Left-wing activists are continually coming up with excuses as to why Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 Presidential Election.

Arguably, their most outrageous excuse is that of interference by Russian hackers in the voting process.

But there is little to no evidence to prove there was actual interference in the election by hackers.

While Hillary Clinton herself claims there was interference in the election, even President Obama is calling Clinton out on her lie.

Breitbart News reported:

President Barack Obama emphatically denounced the conspiracy theory saying Russians successfully tampered with the American voting process.

“We were frankly more concerned in the run-up to the election to the possibilities of vote tampering, which we did not see evidence of,” he said. “And we’re confident that we can guard against.”

Obama went on to add that Russian interference should be of no concern, due to the fact the Russian government “constantly works to influence the American voting system”.

Breitbart News reported:

“None of this should be a big surprise,” Obama said, “Russia trying to influence our elections dates back to the Soviet Union.”

Obama dismissed the hack and the leaked emails as “not very interesting” and lacking “explosive” revelations. He puzzled as to why it was an “obsession” by the news media despite the knowledge that the Russians were responsible.

The fact of the matter is the CIA is making no official statement claiming Russia interfered in the election, nor is any of their supposed evidence reliable.

Breitbart News reported:

The “evidence” that the CIA has gathered is inconclusive. The FBI also disagrees with some of the CIA’s conclusions about Russia’s motives. “While lawmakers were seemingly united on the need to present a strong bipartisan response, the FBI and CIA gave lawmakers differing accounts on Russia’s motives, according to The Post,” The Hill reported on Sunday.

Despite left-wing “fake news,” there is no evidence Russian hackers actually distorted the voting process. The most that the CIA is alleging is that the Russians may have helped hack of the Democratic National Committee emails, as well as (possibly) the emails of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. There is zero evidence Russian hackers messed with voting. Ironically, Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s recount has eliminated any doubt about the integrity of the results.

While Obama was blaming Hillary Clinton for her loss, and Hillary Clinton was blaming the Russians, neither looked at the real reason the Democrats lost the election.

The left supported an incredibly corrupt candidate whose political history was marred by the blood of Americans and her lies to cover up her many faults and failures.

Furthermore, the Obama administration seems to frequently be caught in the middle of political manipulations or false cries of foul-play by other political members. The supposed Russian hacking case is no different.

Breitbart News reported:

The Obama administration has a history of manipulating intelligence for political gain. The most under-reported scandal of Obama’s presidency was the CENTCOM scandal, in which it emerged that “senior U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) leaders manipulated intelligence assessments in 2014 and 2015 to make it appear that President Barack Obama is winning the war against the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL).” There is, even more, reason to doubt the truth of a selective leak about the election.

Essentially, the Democratic side of the government is coming up with all sorts of excuses as to why they lost their footing in 2016, all while ignoring the truth.

While Obama and Clinton may be at odds concerning Russian interference in the election, one thing is certain: the Democratic Party is devastated after a disastrous eight-year presidency, and the American people are sick of the status quo.

What are your thoughts?

Do you believe there is any actual link between the election and Russian political influence?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.