Scientists figured out how the Obama administration was “cooking” the books on global warming and as soon as they did the left started screaming “this will elevate dangerous dissent.”

In other words, they are afraid people will see the truth about their lies.

Well, facts are stubborn things.  And when you fake research, sooner or later you will get discovered.

The EPA started looking at Obama’s data, and what they found was shocking.

The report rips apart the so-called Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data that was put together by the Obama administration to justify U.S. involvement in the Paris Accord and created a panic that CO2 was creating global warming.

The sad fact is, it isn’t true.  We’ve been wasting billions of dollars solving a problem that doesn’t exist.

The report from Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. Joseph S. D’Aleo, and Dr. Craig D. Idso at the EPA concluded:

The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are NOT a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.”

In short, we have been sold a bold-faced lie.

From The Daily Caller:

“The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

“You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” said D’Aleo, who co-authored the study with statistician James Wallace and Cato Institute climate scientist Craig Idso.

Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

In other words, in the 1940s there was a warming trend like we are seeing right now.  But they ignored it, because they could not blame it on man-made factors.

Think of it like you were playing BlackJack, and the dealer arbitrarily ignores Aces whenever it works in his favor.  That’s what Obama’s administration did.  It ignored years that didn’t fit their narrative and called it “an adjustment.”

Calling out the fictional work of these adjustments has not gone without criticism.

In the Washington Post, some at the EPA complained:

“This is not about honest scientific debate. This is a dangerous attempt to elevate the status of minority opinions, and to undercut the legitimacy, objectivity and transparency of existing climate science.”

In other words, our minds are made up, so shut up.  The only problem is they want you to pay for their closed minds.