Google’s auto-complete searches have been showing a very unsavory trend lately, and it seems to be falling in line with those who have been bribed or manipulated by Hillary.

With the election drawing nearer each day, more and more people have taken to the internet to gain insight on the issues that matter to them.

While some immediately go to sights which support their affiliated party, some search basic questions relating to their voting rights.

The Daily Caller reports:

Google auto-complete search results favor Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump when someone attempts to find out how they can vote for either candidate. Trump’s name is completely omitted from the auto-complete results.”

While Google has explained that search results derive from the location in which you search from as well as the terms you have searched, there are some inaccuracies in their excuses.

The Daily Caller reports:

Daily Caller reporters in heavily-Republican and heavily-Democratic locations have gotten the same results as above. Google pointed TheDC to a blog post that said: “Autocomplete isn’t an exact science, and the output of the prediction algorithms changes frequently. Predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity and freshness of search terms.”

The bias towards Clinton appears when certain questions are asked, such as “how do you vote for…” or “how do I vote?”

The released John Podesta emails has unsurprisingly revealed that the CEO of Google’s parent company, Eric Schmidt, is working directly with the Clinton campaign.

The emails also revealed that Podesta reached out to Schmidt to set up a meeting with Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook.

Many employees of Google are also named in the emails released by the recent Wikileaks dump.

A name that appears frequently is that of Jared Cohen, the founder of ‘Google Ideas’ (now rebranded as ‘Jigsaw’), who was revealed to be working with Clinton’s organization in attempt to influence regime change in Syria.

Julian Assange, a Moscow journalist, has claimed Google is directly engaged in Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Breitbart News reports:

“We should understand that Google…is intensely assigned with U.S. exceptionalism…personally at the top aligned with Hillary Clinton’s election campaign and almost certainly once Hillary Clinton becomes resident, those people in Google, like Jared Cohen, will be placed into positions around the new Clinton presidency” said Assange, heavily implying that Google and it’s employees could directly benefit from a Clinton presidency.

Assange spotlighted the direct control Google seems to have over its user’s internet influences.

The information provided to constituents in America via the Internet is ultimately the most important when undecided voters are seeking advice, and Google’s hand in the Clinton campaign is inexcusable when concerned with manipulating influences on the voting population.

Not surprisingly, Donald Trump’s name is omitted from the search results entirely, unless his specific name is typed in along with the same question.

What are your thoughts? Is Google’s corruption and influence over voters a concerning matter as the election draws near?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.