Liberals like Nancy Pelosi sit around waiting for tragedies so they can manipulate them to push their anti-gun agenda.

And after the tragedy in Las Vegas, Pelosi rushed to be at the front of the pack of gun grabbers demanding Congress chip away at the Second Amendment.

But in one TV appearance, Pelosi revealed her true plans for your guns.

Left-wing network CNN provided Pelosi with a one hour long infomercial in the form of a town hall event to press the case for more gun control.

When questioned about what Congress could do, Pelosi spouted off the usual talking points about “universal background checks.”

Of course, that means creating a national gun registration database.

But what really frightened gun owners was Pelosi’s remark that America “would have to do other things as well.”

Breitbart reports:

During a town hall on CNN on Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stated that universal background checks would save lives, but “many other things” would have to be done as well.

Pelosi said that if background checks were expanded to cover various sales that are exempt, “it would save lives. But it isn’t the complete answer. We’d have to do many other things as well. And people have to be vigilant. We don’t want people reporting on each other. We respect people’s, not only Second Amendment rights, but their Fourth Amendment rights, but something must have been obvious to someone about this along the way.”

What Democrats mean by “other things” is gun confiscation.

They may deny it, but their leaders are increasingly being vocal about their desire to storm into homes across America and rip every gun out of their owner’s hands.

Over the last few years, both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have increasingly praised Australia’s gun confiscation law that was passed in the mid-1990s.

Hillary even said during the Presidential campaign that it was something worth looking at.

Breitbart also reports:

Barack Obama, June 2014: [emphasis added]

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown. And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since. Our levels of gun violence are off the charts. There’s no advanced, developed country that would put up with this.

Barack Obama, June 2015:

“When Australia had a mass killing – I think it was in Tasmania – about 25 years ago, it was just so shocking the entire country said, ‘well we’re going to completely change our gun laws,’ and they did. And it hasn’t happened since.” …

“I don’t foresee any legislative action being taken in this Congress,” he said. “And I don’t foresee any real action until the American public feels a sufficient sense of urgency and they say to themselves, ‘This is not normal, this is something that we can change and we’re going to change it’.”

Hillary Clinton, October 2015

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: You know, Australia’s a good example, Canada’s a good example, [and] the UK’s a good example. Why? Because each of them had mass killings. Australia had a huge mass killing about 20 or 25 years ago. Canada did as well, so did the UK. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws. In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of … weapons offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns and basically clamped down going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach – more of a permitting approach.”

When liberals like Pelosi claim there are “other things” Congress must do when the subject of guns comes up, they increasingly mean confiscation.

What are your thoughts?

Let us know in the comment section.