The Obama administration colluded with the Deep State to destroy Donald Trump.

High ranking Obama and FBI officials used allegations of collusion to cast a cloud of suspicion over Trump’s victory.

Now one slip of paper proved their guilt and could bring Obama’s Deep State crashing down.

The media heralded the 2017 assessment from four intelligence community agencies that Putin interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump.

Journalists used this to taint Trump’s win and generate the momentum behind allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow.

But not everyone was on board.

Retired National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers stated that the fake news Christopher Steele dossier was used as evidence in part to prove Putin’s motivations.

Rogers was one of the few officials who did not back up the assessment’s assertion that Putin personally ordered the cyber attacks in the 2016 election.

Real Clear Investigations reports:

“Recently retired National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers stated in a classified letter to Congress that the Clinton campaign-funded memos did factor into the ICA. And James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence under President Obama, conceded in a recent CNN interview that the assessment was based on “some of the substantive content of the dossier.” Without elaborating, he maintained that “we were able to corroborate” certain allegations…

…In a March 5, 2018, letter to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, Adm. Rogers informed the committee that a two-page summary of the dossier — described as “the Christopher Steele information” — was “added” as an “appendix to the ICA draft,” and that consideration of that appendix was “part of the overall ICA review/approval process.”

His skepticism of the dossier may explain why the NSA parted company with other intelligence agencies and cast doubt on one of its crucial conclusions: that Vladimir Putin personally ordered a cyberattack on Hillary Clinton’s campaign to help Donald Trump win the White House. 

Rogers has testified that while he was sure the Russians wanted to hurt Clinton, he wasn’t as confident as CIA and FBI officials that their actions were designed to help Trump, explaining that such as assessment “didn’t have the same level of sourcing and the same level of multiple sources.”

The dossier, which is made up of 16 opposition research-style memos on Trump underwritten by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s own campaign, is based mostly on uncorroborated third-hand sources. Still, the ICA has been viewed by much of the Washington establishment as the unimpeachable consensus of the U.S. intelligence community. Its conclusions that “Vladimir Putin ordered” the hacking and leaking of Clinton campaign emails “to help Trump’s chances of victory” have driven the “Russia collusion” narrative and subsequent investigations besieging the Trump presidency.”

This is a bombshell and it proves that John Brennan – Obama’s former CIA Director – lied before Congress when he testified that the dossier was not used in any way as part of the assessment.

And Rogers letter also proves that Obama’s cabal conspired to use fake news to advance the Russian collusion hoax and undermine the legitimacy of American democracy and elections.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.