Screen Shot 2016-06-13 at 8.48.43 AM

If anyone who seriously supports Hillary’s candidacy doesn’t have an issue with what the FBI just found on her phone, then they really might want to re-evaluate their priorities…especially given how damning this new material is!

Plus, in light of the recent shooting in Orlando, it’s time to highlight the obvious logical disconnect displayed by Hillary and her supporters when it comes to their reactions to violence and death.

In the wake of the terror attack in Orlando, Hillary supporters, along with the candidate herself, have spoken out against violence and the second amendment since the Islamic gunman stormed a nightclub and murdered 50 people.

And while they decry the senseless loss of life, the FBI’s investigation has revealed Mrs. Clinton was using her cell phone to order the assassinations of hundreds of people in distant countries.

And yet no liberal outrage.

Why? Don’t they want everyone to live?

Here’s what we know about Hillary’s murderous plans.

According to the FBI’s findings, Mrs. Clinton enjoyed a special arrangement with the CIA which allowed her to approve the assassination of questionable targets in Pakistan from an unsecured mobile device.

This wasn’t a “once in a blue moon” kind of thing.

Apparently, Mrs. Clinton along with the rest of her State Department received large numbers of requests by the CIA to eliminate targets, to which they happily complied in almost every instance.

Under Sec. Clinton, State Department officials approved almost every single proposed CIA drone assassination. They only objected to one or two attacks.

The emails that are at the heart of the FBI’s criminal investigation are 2011 and 2012 messages between U.S. diplomats in Pakistan and their State Department superiors in D.C., in which the officials approved drone strikes.

Clinton’s aides forwarded some of these emails to her personal email account, on a private server in her home in suburban New York.

These are the revelations of a report by The Wall Street Journal, based on information provided by anonymous congressional and law-enforcement officials who were briefed on the FBI’s probe.

And with all this evidence about Hillary’s discretion in killing people in foreign nation’s from her palm there’s not a peep from the anti-gun, anti-violence liberal establishment.

It’s as if they don’t care their candidate of choice has a penchant for dealing out death and refusing to claim responsibility for it.

And yet the FBI’s investigation is a criminal investigation…how telling.

Remember this too, before any liberals say Mrs. Clinton was just doing her job they have to come to terms with the fact her actions were done in a direct attempt to avoid being tracked by the U.S. government.

Everything was conducted on her homebrew email server, which was at great risk to national security.

State Department officials were given notice before a planned attack, sometimes with a narrow timeframe of as few as 30 minutes. Officials told the FBI that they used a less-secure system of communication when they had to make a decision quickly before a drone killing and were not at the office.

Roughly half a dozen times, State Department officials sent emails on their smartphones in order to approve a drone assassination when they were away from secure communications systems.

The U.S. is very secretive about its covert CIA drone campaign. Strict U.S. classification rules bar officials from discussing drone killings publicly and outside of secure communications systems.

Given this secrecy, law-enforcement and intelligence officials told the Journal that State Department discussion of the covert CIA drone program should have been conducted via a more secure communications system.

Even some liberal publications are starting to pick up on this as they’re realizing Mrs. Clinton purposefully flouting the law has wider implications…including her ability to faithfully lead our great nation forward with transparency and integrity.

Still, for all the evidence investigators have been able to muster against the former Secretary of State a conviction for criminal activity will likely not be forthcoming.

Care to guess why?

Tell us why you think Mrs. Clinton won’t have to pay the piper in the comments below.